Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Team:
Conf: State:
By Conf By Coach
Start: End:
vs. Top: or
Venue: | Type:
Min. Games:
Show:

2023 Customizable T-Rank and Tempo-Free Stats


D-I Avg:

105.1

0.4956
Eff. FG%
50.3
Turnover%
18.6
Rebound%
28.6
FT Rate
31.5
2-Pt %
50
3-Pt %
33.9

67.2
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag EFG% EFGD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB
78 Utah Valley WAC 21 18-6
9–2
107.1
128
97.5
40
.7453
78
50.9
153
44.8
10
19.3
242
16.6
292
28.7
184
30
234
34.8
81
28.2
103
51.2
131
43
5
33.5
193
32.2
93
68.9
92
-0.2
56
241 UT Rio Grande Valley WAC 21 12-12
3–8
102.7
226
108.4
249
.3493
241
51.6
115
51.9
260
23.2
355
16.8
277
28.7
184
28.5
180
48.1
1
37.4
303
51.7
111
51.8
258
34.3
164
34.7
221
72.8
7
-6.9
211
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag Efg% EfgD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB

Play-by-Play splits

Dunks Close Twos Farther Twos Threes
Dunks Close Twos Far Twos Threes
Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense
O% D% O% D% O% D% O% D%
FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share
1 UT Rio Grande Valley WAC95.35.693.893.85.85645.659.759.739.442.221.138.838.824.134.433.234.734.736.5
2 Utah Valley WAC87.111.476.776.73.459.139.648.348.338.339.526.735.935.928.233.533.732.232.233.5

Trends

(If these fail to load, try refreshing)

;

Compiled by Bart Torvik from sacred data and secret formulas.
Quadrant filter based on NCAA thresholds and estimated Selection Sunday NET rank