Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout


#235 - UT Rio Grande Valley (13-11)

Kahil FennellSouthland Conference (5-8)

Tourney ResultsTeamcastTeam History

Similar ResumésSimilar Profiles
Rooting GuideTeam View


Trend Stat: 🔬

Start game No.: | End game No: |
Std. Dev:


Team Stats

Vs: | Venue:
Category Offense Defense Barthag
Adj. Eff. 105.1 211 111.0 253 .3474 235
eFG% 50.9 176 52.2 243
TO% 19.0 283 18.3 113
OR% 32.1 122 32.1 286
FTR 26.8 341 30.8 127
Adjust? Split?
Shooting Stats
3P% 30.3 325 32.7 133
2P% 56.4 28 53.9 284
FT% 69.6 256 75.5 330
Block % 6.7 12 6.2 327
Stylistic Stats
3P Rate 50.1 8 35.3 66
Ast. Rate 55.7 93 50.5 139
Adj. Tempo 69.567

Fun Stuff

Category Offense Defense Barthag
Qual. Eff. 121.4 29 107.5 203 .8030 74
Last 10 Eff. 101.9 269 111.4 258 .2651 268
Close Games 3-4 (.429) 225
Qual. Games 0-3 (.000) 304
F.U.N. 0.0119 160
(Expected) Strength of Schedule
Non-con Overall
Elite L% 19 % 101 13 % 185
Basic 0.3225 337 0.3768 268
Current 0.3225 337 0.371 273
Committee Resumé Metrics
Q1-A Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Projected 0-2 0-4 0-1 0-4 12-6
Current 0-2 0-3 0-1 0-3 9-4
Tourney Odds
Seed Auto Total
15.8 0.4% 0.4%

Schedule / Results

Offense Defense
Date Opponent Result/Line Record WAB AdjO AdjD EFF eFG% TO% OR% FTR 2P 3P EFF eFG% TO% OR% FTR 2P 3P G-Sc +/-
Mon 11-04 11-04 A 224 40 (I) Nebraska Neb L, 87-67 76 0-1 -0.3 101.6 101.6 87.6 49.2 26.2 22.5 14.5 11-21 13-41 113.8 54.4 17.0 32.4 61.4 22-38 6-19 50 -5.6
Wed 11-06 11-06 A 223 30 (I-A) Creighton Creigh L, 99-86 77 0-2 -0.6 127.0 115.8 112.0 51.9 13.0 32.6 13.0 19-42 14-35 129.0 66.4 19.5 28.0 52.7 26-32 7-23 74 -5.9
Sun 11-10 11-10 H 207 0 (Ⅳ) Champion Chris. Champi W, 110-60 87 1-2 -0.6 - - 126.8 58.2 10.4 36.7 6.5 28-44 17-48 69.2 35.0 19.6 13.2 22.9 11-33 9-37 - -
Fri 11-15 11-15 N 207 282 (Ⅳ) Charleston Southern ChSo W, 86-76 79 2-2 -0.5 103.6 104.3 109.2 55.9 17.8 24.2 19.1 32-45 4-23 96.5 54.5 26.7 30.6 42.9 20-35 7-21 48 2.9
Sat 11-16 11-16 N 203 277 (Ⅳ) Tennessee Tech TNTech W, 83-58 68 3-2 -0.4 112.6 96.2 122.9 56.3 17.8 48.5 23.4 21-34 10-30 85.9 46.7 19.2 18.4 3.3 12-26 11-35 86 6.6
Mon 11-18 11-18 A 183 13 (I-A) Wisconsin Wisc L, 87-84 70 3-3 -0.6 135.7 105.0 120.5 59.5 14.3 23.3 17.5 18-30 13-33 124.8 56.6 12.9 31.0 60.4 18-33 8-20 95 2.1
Mon 11-25 11-25 H 169 347 (Ⅳ) Le Moyne LeMoy W, 97-77 75 4-3 -0.6 109.6 112.0 128.8 56.3 13.3 37.5 25.0 21-32 13-40 102.2 55.8 26.5 36.4 25.0 23-38 7-22 44 6.8
Thu 12-05 12-05 H 151 278 (Ⅳ) Stephen F. Austin SFA W, 68-65 71 5-3 (1-0) -0.6 97.8 107.8 96.2 47.2 24.1 28.6 38.9 12-27 9-27 92.0 41.4 19.8 37.8 44.8 24-47 0-11 25 -0.4
Sat 12-07 12-07 H 152 195 (Ⅳ) Lamar Lamar L, 84-52 67 5-4 (1-1) -1.5 82.6 126.8 77.6 38.0 25.4 27.8 22.2 13-25 5-29 125.3 62.5 14.9 33.3 10.9 31-51 6-13 1 -12.5
Sat 12-14 12-14 H 197 0 (Ⅳ) Northern New Mexico Northe W, 72-60 68 6-4 -1.5 - - 105.5 56.0 20.5 21.2 48.0 13-21 10-29 87.9 46.6 20.5 27.3 29.3 15-44 8-14 - -
Wed 12-18 12-18 H 195 305 (Ⅳ) Southern Utah USU W, 78-73 73 7-4 -1.5 103.6 109.1 106.5 51.6 12.3 22.9 37.7 24-36 5-25 99.6 45.5 16.4 30.0 24.2 24-45 4-21 36 4.7
Sat 12-21 12-21 H 195 0 (Ⅳ) Biblical Stud. (TX) Biblic W, 106-56 77 8-4 -1.5 - - 137.6 61.7 16.9 45.5 9.9 14-23 24-58 72.7 36.6 19.5 20.5 10.4 20-50 3-17 - -
Mon 12-30 12-30 H 191 0 (Ⅳ) Dallas Christian Dallas W, 88-44 73 9-4 -1.5 - - 121.1 58.2 20.6 42.1 20.9 15-25 16-42 60.6 26.9 17.9 21.8 21.5 4-36 9-29 - -
Sat 1-04 1-04 A 180 339 (Ⅳ) New Orleans NO W, 76-64 65 10-4 (2-1) -1.4 109.0 101.9 116.4 49.2 16.8 47.7 27.3 13-27 13-39 98.0 41.1 12.2 29.3 27.4 21-47 3-15 69 9.3
Mon 1-06 1-06 A 174 202 (Ⅲ) Southeastern Louisiana SELA L, 79-75 69 10-5 (2-2) -2.2 114.4 115.5 109.3 49.2 20.4 40.5 34.4 9-18 14-43 115.1 50.0 16.0 32.3 55.6 21-40 4-14 47 2.2
Sat 1-11 1-11 A 179 151 (Ⅲ) Texas A&M Corpus Chris TAMUCC L, 79-74 64 10-6 (2-3) -2.9 113.7 124.4 115.8 60.3 17.2 34.4 24.1 20-30 10-28 123.7 55.8 7.8 30.0 25.0 23-42 7-18 26 -8.1
Mon 1-13 1-13 H 182 333 (Ⅳ) Texas A&M Commerce TAMC W, 57-55 61 11-6 (3-3) -2.9 85.6 104.1 93.7 45.2 24.7 41.0 42.3 13-26 7-26 90.4 45.5 26.3 42.5 19.6 12-29 9-27 9 -4.5
Sat 1-18 1-18 A 200 230 (Ⅳ) Houston Christian HCU L, 66-57 71 11-7 (3-4) -3.7 82.3 90.5 80.4 42.2 25.4 27.0 22.4 17-36 5-22 93.1 41.8 18.3 30.8 26.2 15-34 7-27 25 -0.4
Mon 1-20 1-20 A 211 245 (Ⅳ) Incarnate Word UIW W, 85-78 67 12-7 (4-4) -3.6 117.9 120.0 127.7 72.6 18.0 20.0 22.6 34-39 3-14 117.2 56.1 18.0 41.2 7.6 22-45 10-21 45 -3.7
Sat 1-25 1-25 H 207 58 (Ⅱ) McNeese St. McN L, 93-63 67 12-8 (4-5) -4.3 104.8 128.6 93.9 42.7 19.4 33.3 22.6 16-29 7-33 138.6 63.9 19.4 53.3 29.5 21-33 12-28 9 -11.4
Mon 1-27 1-27 H 226 169 (Ⅳ) Nicholls St. NichSt. L, 82-75 71 12-9 (4-6) -5.2 107.2 114.0 106.4 46.0 15.6 32.5 28.6 14-32 10-31 116.3 52.4 14.2 30.6 35.5 19-41 9-21 33 1.2
Sat 2-01 2-01 H 228 151 (Ⅳ) Texas A&M Corpus Chris TAMUCC W, 83-73 76 13-9 (5-6) -5.1 106.7 96.8 108.8 54.0 17.0 27.8 37.1 20-37 9-25 95.7 53.4 23.6 22.9 27.1 21-38 7-21 75 4.9
Mon 2-03 2-03 A 218 243 (Ⅳ) Northwestern St. NWSt. L, 79-63 76 13-10 (5-7) -5.9 84.1 110.9 83.3 36.1 22.5 32.6 44.3 13-28 6-33 104.4 53.4 19.8 25.0 33.9 21-38 7-21 4 -11
Sat 2-08 2-08 A 234 195 (Ⅲ) Lamar Lamar L, 70-68 67 13-11 (5-8) -6.7 102.7 109.0 101.6 52.7 19.4 25.7 27.3 5-18 16-37 104.6 47.7 13.5 28.2 18.8 20-40 7-24 34 -3.9
Mon 2-10 2-10 A 278 (Ⅳ) Stephen F. Austin SFA +1.2, 68-6745% .11
Sat 2-15 2-15 H 230 (Ⅳ) Houston Christian HCU -3.4, 74-7163% .06
Mon 2-17 2-17 H 245 (Ⅳ) Incarnate Word UIW -4.4, 77-7266% .05
Sat 2-22 2-22 A 169 (Ⅲ) Nicholls St. NichSt. +8.1, 81-7323% .25
Mon 2-24 2-24 A 58 (I) McNeese St. McN +19.2, 82-636% .60
Sat 3-01 3-01 H 339 (Ⅳ) New Orleans NO -12.1, 85-7385% .02
Mon 3-03 3-03 H 202 (Ⅳ) Southeastern Louisiana SELA -1.6, 75-7356% .07
Projected Record: 16-15 (8-12) Record WAB Adj. O Adj. D PPP eFG% TO% OR% FTR 2P 3P PPP eFG% TO% OR% FTR 2P 3P G-Sc +/-

UT Rio Grande Valley Player Stats

Show:
Role • Games • Min% • O-Rating • Usage • PRPG! • D-PRPG • BPM • OBPM • DBPM • eFG% • TS% • O Reb% • D Reb% • Ast% • TOV % • A/TO • Blk% • Stl% • FTR • FC/40 • Dunks • Rim • Mid • FTs • Twos • 3P-Rate • 3P/100 • Threes
All • None • Core • Shooting • Basic

Compiled by Bart Torvik from sacred data and secret formulas.