T-Rank Player Stats - Customizable College Basketball Tempo Free Stats

Yr	Cls	Ht	Player	Team	Conf.	Role	G	Min%	PRPG!	BPM	OBPM	DBPM	ORtg	Usg	eFG	TS	OR	DR	Ast	TO	Blk	Stl	FTR	FC/40	FT		2P		3P
2023	Sr	6-1	P.J. Byrd	Sou	SWAC	N/A		76.9	1.6				102.1	21.1			1.3	9.1	23.3	25.9	0.0	2.8

2022	Jr	6-1	P.J. Byrd	Sou	SWAC	Scoring PG	29	63.8	-0.0	-3.5	-3.9	0.4	88.8	19.0	45.0	52.8	1.1	9.1	23.6	32.2	0.2	3.0	49.7	3.8	61-75	.813	35-87	.402	22-64	.344
Conf. games:							Conf. games:		17	59.3	-0.3	-4.7	-5.1	0.4	85.5	19.5	41.0	53.3	0.9	9.4	24.0	37.1	0.0	3.4	66.7	3.8	42-48	.875	16-43	.372	9-29	.310
Top 100 quality games:							Top 100:		5	79.0	-0.1	-4.7	-3.8	-0.8	85.2	16.5	38.3	45.0	0.6	11.8	27.1	27.6	0.8	0.4	46.7	3.5	10-14	.714	4-17	.235	5-13	.385
Top 50 quality games:							Top 50:		3	86.7	0.9	-3.8	-3.3	-0.5	93.9	15.5	52.9	55.4	0.0	11.2	27.2	32.0	1.2	0.6	35.3	3.8	4-6	.667	3-9	.333	4-8	.500

2021	Jr	6-1	P.J. Byrd	CSU	MWC	Scoring PG	27	33.0	0.5	-0.8	-2.3	1.6	102.6	14.8	50.9	57.6	1.8	6.7	18.4	26.3	0.3	2.1	44.8	4.7	22-26	.846	16-25	.640	9-33	.273
Conf. games:							Conf. games:		18	33.1	0.6	-0.5	-2.3	1.8	106.2	14.9	54.1	63.4	0.6	5.5	17.3	29.2	0.5	2.2	54.1	5.0	19-20	.950	11-15	.733	6-22	.273
Top 100 quality games:							Top 100:		13	30.4	0.4	-1.5	-1.7	0.2	94.7	14.9	40.0	49.8	2.2	5.1	20.8	24.6	0.0	2.2	60.0	3.0	12-15	.800	7-11	.636	2-14	.143
Top 50 quality games:							Top 50:		6	29.6	1.2	2.5	2.0	0.5	105.1	17.9	35.7	49.6	3.2	1.6	23.8	13.8	0.0	3.3	92.9	1.7	10-13	.769	2-3	.667	2-11	.182

2020	So	6-1	P.J. Byrd	CSU	MWC	Scoring PG	8	3.8	0.4	-2.7	-2.8	0.0	100.5	23.1	50.0	58.2	5.0	9.6	15.5	25.7	0.0	2.4	53.8	8.3	6-7	.857	2-8	.250	3-5	.600
Conf. games:							Conf. games:		7	5.3	0.2	-3.4	-4.1	0.7	92.2	21.6	35.0	44.4	6.2	9.0	18.1	20.9	0.0	3.0	50.0	7.4	4-5	.800	2-7	.286	1-3	.333
Top 100 quality games:							Top 100:		2	4.8	0.7	2.3	-0.4	2.7	96.1	23.2	41.7	50.6	4.8	10.3	26.1	21.0	0.0	2.4	66.7	6.7	3-4	.750	1-4	.250	1-2	.500

2019	Fr	6-1	P.J. Byrd	VCU	A10	Scoring PG	33	22.6	-0.6	-6.5	-7.0	0.4	71.1	15.5	32.4	43.2	1.5	4.7	20.5	43.4	0.0	1.2	59.5	4.7	17-22	.773	6-18	.333	4-19	.211
Conf. games:							Conf. games:		18	26.4	-0.6	-5.3	-6.5	1.2	77.1	15.3	38.9	44.3	0.7	5.8	20.3	38.2	0.0	1.5	44.4	5.3	8-12	.667	6-15	.400	3-12	.250
Top 100 quality games:							Top 100:		12	17.3	-0.5	-5.8	-6.3	0.6	69.1	14.1	54.5	54.5	2.7	2.5	14.2	50.3	0.0	0.7	0.0	5.2	0-0	.000	3-6	.500	2-5	.400
Top 50 quality games:							Top 50:		4	15.0	-0.1	-3.7	-5.6	1.8	100.4	2.9	0.0	0.0	8.3	0.0	8.3	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	5.0	0-0	.000	0-0	.000	0-1	.000

Career:									0.0	-3.4	-4.1	0.7	88.9	17.4	44.8	52.7	1.5	7.6	21.4	32.9	0.2	2.4	50.7	4.4	106-130	.815	59-138	.428	38-121	.314
Career:			0.0	88.9	17.4	44.8	1.5	7.6	21.4	32.9

2022 Play-by-play stats

DUNKS		At the rim			Other 2-PT			3-Pt Jumpers
Tot	Pct.	Tot	Pct.	Ast'ed	Tot	Pct.	Ast'ed	Tot	Pct.	Ast'ed
0-0	0%	14-31	45.2%	0.0%	21-56	37.5%	4.8%	22-64	34.4%	72.7%

P.J. Byrd 2022 Advanced Stats Game Log
Date		Opponent	Result	Mins	ORtg	Usage	eFG	TS%	OR%	DR%	AST%	TO%	Stl%	Blk%	Dunk	Rim	Mid	2Pt	3Pt	FT	Ast	TO	Stl	Blk	OR	DR	PF	BPM	OPM	DPM	NET	Pts
11-9		@ Louisville	L, 72–60	20	80.0	28.3	21	42	0	9	11	19	0	0	0-0	0-2	0-2	0-4	1-3	6-8	1	2	0	0	0	2	2	-5.8	-3.7	-2.2	-2.1	9
11-13		@ Tulane	W, 73–70	37	98.1	20.0	92	81	0	20	38	44	0	3	0-0	0-0	1-2	1-2	3-4	1-3	9	6	0	1	0	6	3	+2.5	0.6	1.9	+1.3	12
11-16		@ Rice	L, 81–63	28	65.6	14.4	29	29	4	10	14	13	0	0	0-0	1-2	1-3	2-5	0-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	1	2	1	-11.6	-6.9	-4.7	-5.5	4
11-19		@ South Dakota	L, 71–68	23	103.4	26.3	72	72	0	6	12	28	2	0	0-0	4-5	1-2	5-7	1-2	0-0	1	3	1	0	0	1	4	-0.2	-0.3	0.1	+0.3	13
11-21		@ Nebraska	L, 82–59	34	59.3	12.6	17	17	3	19	34	24	0	0	0-0	0-1	1-3	1-4	0-2	0-0	6	2	0	0	1	4	2	-6.6	-5.2	-1.4	-4.1	2
11-28		@ Tennessee St.	W, 82–80	23	131.1	22.4	64	65	0	5	35	11	7	0	0-0	0-0	3-5	3-5	1-2	2-3	4	1	3	0	0	1	4	+7.0	1.9	5.1	+3.5	11
12-4		@ Akron	L, 79–62	27	67.5	27.2	45	43	8	9	8	37	8	0	0-0	0-3	0-1	0-4	3-6	0-1	1	5	4	0	2	2	2	+2.0	-0.9	2.8	+1.1	9
12-7		@ Kentucky	L, 76–64	28	67.3	15.4	33	39	0	9	7	28	2	0	0-0	0-0	2-4	2-4	0-2	1-1	1	2	1	0	0	2	3	-8.3	-7.4	-0.9	-4.7	5
12-11		Southeastern Louisiana	W, 72–66	31	99.9	18.7	50	72	0	0	23	38	5	0	0-0	0-0	1-1	1-1	0-1	7-9	4	4	3	0	0	0	3	+0.8	-2.1	3.0	+1.2	9
12-19		@ Kent St.	W, 78–76	24	128.0	16.3	64	64	0	7	22	14	5	0	0-0	3-3	0-1	3-4	1-3	0-0	3	1	2	0	0	1	1	+6.5	4.3	2.3	+2.8	9
Date		Opponent	Result	Mins	ORtg	Usage	eFG	TS%	OR%	DR%	AST%	TO%	Stl%	Blk%	Dunk	Rim	Mid	2Pt	3Pt	FT	Ast	TO	Stl	Blk	OR	DR	PF	BPM	OPM	DPM	NET	Pts
12-21		@ Dayton	L, 69–60	39	106.8	10.8	30	42	0	4	29	14	0	0	0-0	0-1	0-2	0-3	1-2	2-2	6	1	0	0	0	1	4	-6.6	-3.9	-2.8	-4.8	5
1-3	•	Texas Southern	W, 63–50	25	139.1	19.4	50	68	0	13	60	12	5	0	0-0	0-0	2-3	2-3	0-1	4-4	7	1	2	0	0	3	1	+14.5	7.4	7.1	+6.2	8
1-8	•	@ Florida A&M	W, 80–66	29	67.7	16.3	40	40	4	4	15	47	4	0	0-0	0-0	2-5	2-5	0-0	0-0	3	4	2	0	1	1	2	-8.5	-7.6	-0.9	-3.7	4
1-10	•	@ Bethune Cookman	W, 69–59	21	55.5	22.9	0	25	0	16	17	24	3	0	0-0	0-2	0-2	0-4	0-2	4-4	2	2	1	0	0	3	3	-15.2	-13.7	-1.5	-4.8	4
1-15	•	@ Grambling St.	L, 83–77	31	99.6	31.1	33	53	0	9	35	25	0	0	0-0	2-3	1-4	3-7	0-2	7-7	6	4	0	0	0	2	3	-9.6	-3.3	-6.4	-3.9	13
1-22	•	Arkansas Pine Bluff	W, 99–51	20	144.3	10.9	150	150	0	11	32	44	2	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	2-2	0-0	5	2	1	0	0	2	0	+9.2	5.9	3.3	+4.7	6
1-24	•	Mississippi Valley St.	W, 100–72	23	141.8	16.9	125	119	0	17	43	39	5	0	0-0	0-0	1-1	1-1	1-1	2-2	8	3	2	0	0	3	3	+9.9	4.2	5.7	+5.4	7
1-29	•	@ Alcorn St.	L, 68–64	19	0.0	24.6	0	0	0	26	0	65	3	0	0-0	0-0	0-1	0-1	0-2	0-0	0	5	1	0	0	3	2	-25.8	-20.8	-5.0	-8.1	0
1-31	•	@ Jackson St.	W, 75–64	33	144.9	17.5	90	90	5	12	11	21	4	0	0-0	0-0	3-4	3-4	1-1	6-7	2	2	2	0	1	3	1	+7.2	4.9	2.3	+4.6	15
2-5	•	Alabama A&M	W, 73–64	27	144.8	15.7	125	95	0	9	47	25	4	0	0-0	0-0	1-1	1-1	1-1	6-8	6	2	2	0	0	2	3	+8.6	4.2	4.4	+5.4	11
Date		Opponent	Result	Mins	ORtg	Usage	eFG	TS%	OR%	DR%	AST%	TO%	Stl%	Blk%	Dunk	Rim	Mid	2Pt	3Pt	FT	Ast	TO	Stl	Blk	OR	DR	PF	BPM	OPM	DPM	NET	Pts
2-7	•	Alabama St.	W, 72–58	22	76.8	15.0	150	128	0	5	15	68	3	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	1-1	2-2	2	4	1	0	0	1	5	-8.7	-10.2	1.4	-2.7	5
2-12	•	@ Prairie View A&M	L, 84–77	21	74.9	22.3	36	38	0	0	33	31	5	0	0-0	1-2	0-1	1-3	1-4	1-2	4	3	2	0	0	0	3	-3.8	-4.0	0.1	-1.0	6
2-14	•	@ Texas Southern	W, 70–58	30	47.0	21.0	0	23	0	7	11	29	8	0	0-0	0-2	0-3	0-5	0-2	4-4	2	3	4	0	0	2	2	-6.0	-8.9	2.9	-2.7	4
2-19	•	Grambling St.	L, 61–57	33	68.5	20.6	31	34	3	13	47	35	2	0	0-0	0-1	1-3	1-4	1-4	1-2	6	4	1	0	1	4	3	-9.2	-7.5	-1.7	-4.1	6
2-26	•	Bethune Cookman	L, 87–84	8	0.0	30.6	0	0	0	0	0	100	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	4	0	0	0	0	3	-44.4	-31.3	-13.1	-5.8	0
2-28	•	Florida A&M	W, 58–49	20	47.1	15.2	50	50	0	7	0	63	3	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	1-3	0-0	0	3	1	0	0	1	2	-12.0	-11.7	-0.4	-3.3	3
3-3	•	@ Alabama St.	L, 77–67	28	79.4	20.5	40	57	0	5	7	37	6	0	0-0	2-3	0-1	2-4	0-1	5-6	1	4	3	0	0	1	2	-4.5	-5.2	0.7	-1.2	9
3-5	•	@ Alabama A&M	W, 50–49	16	8.2	15.7	0	0	0	0	14	47	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-1	0-1	0-2	0-0	1	2	0	0	0	0	1	-20.4	-14.5	-5.9	-5.0	0
3-10	›	v. Grambling St.	L, 60–58	23	106.9	16.5	57	57	0	5	24	16	3	0	0-0	1-1	0-0	1-1	2-6	0-0	2	1	1	0	0	1	3	+0.7	-1.2	1.9	+1.0	8
																					3.3	2.8	1.4	0.0	2.1							6.8

P.J. Byrd 2022 Statistical Trends

Show trend for:

Career stats for P.J. Byrd

RecruiT-Rank (0-100): 58.0

2022 Play-by-play stats

P.J. Byrd 2022 Advanced Stats Game Log

P.J. Byrd 2022 Statistical Trends

P.J. Byrd 2022 Offensive Skill Curve