Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Career stats for Ayinde Hikim

RecruiT-Rank (0-100): 44.8

Yr Cls Ht Player Team Conf. Role G Min% PRPG! BPM OBPM DBPM ORtg Usg eFG TS OR DR Ast TO Blk Stl FTR FC/40 FT 2P 3P
2022Jr5-11Ayinde HikimLowellAEN/A52.81.6104.223.02.19.825.817.81.22.5
2021So5-11Ayinde HikimLaSalleA10Pure PG1116.30.8-0.6-0.70.198.221.241.545.02.25.431.917.30.03.723.44.38-11.72712-39.3085-8.625
Conf. games:Conf. games:611.41.73.12.70.4123.617.557.559.71.54.933.816.90.02.910.04.62-21.0004-13.3085-7.714
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:414.82.95.44.41.0137.221.155.662.40.06.343.59.40.02.033.36.16-61.0007-15.4672-3.667
2020Fr5-11Ayinde HikimLaSalleA10Pure PG2952.30.1-4.8-4.3-0.483.123.142.045.83.17.632.131.30.42.837.44.839-61.63961-144.4245-19.263
Conf. games:Conf. games:1755.40.1-6.9-5.0-1.980.424.140.244.13.89.329.030.70.32.036.64.826-41.63439-101.3864-11.364
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:952.10.5-5.8-4.3-1.580.325.641.246.13.49.537.434.00.51.942.15.516-24.66719-48.3963-9.333
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:652.90.7-5.6-3.6-2.081.726.747.250.53.311.733.133.10.90.950.06.611-18.61114-29.4832-7.286
Career:0.3-4.0-3.6-0.386.122.741.945.72.97.232.128.50.33.034.64.747-72.65373-183.39910-27.370
Career:0.386.122.741.92.97.232.128.5

2021 Play-by-play stats

DUNKS At the rim Other 2-PT 3-Pt Jumpers
Tot Pct. Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed
0-00% 11-2839.3%18.2% 1-119.1%0.0% 4-757.1%50.0%

Ayinde Hikim 2021 Advanced Stats Game Log

DateOpponentResultMinsORtgUsageeFGTS%OR%DR%AST%TO%Stl%Blk%DunkRimMid2Pt3PtFTAstTOStlBlkORDRPFBPMOPMDPMNETPts
11-25 v. San FranciscoW, 76–68Did not Play
11-28 v. Illinois St.L, 82–72Did not Play
11-29 @ Ohio St.L, 74–64Did not Play
12-3 v. North Carolina St.L, 90–59Did not Play
12-21β€’ VermontW, 73–65Did not Play
12-22β€’ VermontL, 62–53Did not Play
12-27β€’ @ Stony BrookL, 73–58Did not Play
12-28β€’ @ Stony BrookL, 71–64Did not Play
1-2β€’ NJITL, 73–67Did not Play
1-3β€’ NJITW, 74–60Did not Play
1-9β€’ HartfordW, 71–62Did not Play
1-10β€’ HartfordL, 75–58Did not Play
1-16β€’ @ BinghamtonW, 92–78Did not Play
1-17β€’ @ BinghamtonW, 77–67Did not Play
2-5β€’ @ New HampshireW, 74–69Did not Play
2-6β€’ @ New HampshireL, 74–63Did not Play
2-12β€’ @ AlbanyW, 79–71Did not Play
2-13β€’ @ AlbanyL, 81–69Did not Play
2-20β€’ New HampshireL, 69–67Did not Play
2-27β€Ί v. Stony BrookW, 64–62Did not Play
2-28β€Ί @ New HampshireW, 72–64Did not Play
3-6β€Ί @ UMBCW, 79–77Did not Play
3-13β€Ί @ HartfordL, 64–50Did not Play