Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Career stats for Zion Williams

RecruiT-Rank (0-100): 0.0

Yr Cls Ht Player Team Conf. Role G Min% PRPG! BPM OBPM DBPM ORtg Usg eFG TS OR DR Ast TO Blk Stl FTR FC/40 FT 2P 3P
2022Sr6-4Zion WilliamsGWebbBSthN/A77.21.3104.316.65.414.614.020.21.42.1
2021Sr6-4Zion WilliamsUMKCSumWing G2080.60.1-1.9-2.91.090.918.048.550.65.617.114.825.20.82.827.74.523-36.63954-106.5096-24.250
Conf. games:Conf. games:1483.00.1-1.8-2.70.991.018.850.052.26.118.612.525.50.32.933.34.020-32.62539-78.5006-18.333
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:369.2-1.0-5.8-5.3-0.578.014.933.334.56.011.815.321.23.40.813.36.31-2.5005-11.4550-4.000
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:1100.0-10.1-10.8-10.1-0.715.011.20.00.03.411.15.345.82.91.70.04.00-0.0000-2.0000-2.000
2020So6-4Zion WilliamsUMKCWACCombo G2642.9-0.2-3.1-3.30.293.912.959.057.44.49.413.130.80.82.136.14.410-22.45530-52.5774-9.444
Conf. games:Conf. games:1550.40.4-1.8-2.20.4106.812.967.564.94.99.314.027.70.81.845.04.49-18.50021-32.6564-8.500
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:533.5-0.1-6.4-3.7-2.780.317.450.052.25.56.46.530.40.00.941.73.63-5.6006-12.5000-0.000
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:233.8-0.5-10.3-6.5-3.966.919.960.058.84.614.30.043.30.00.040.04.41-2.5003-5.6000-0.000
Career:-0.0-2.4-3.10.792.215.851.852.85.113.814.127.60.82.531.34.533-58.56984-158.53210-33.303
Career:-0.092.215.851.85.113.814.127.6

2021 Play-by-play stats

DUNKS At the rim Other 2-PT 3-Pt Jumpers
Tot Pct. Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed
2-366.7% 39-6758.2%48.7% 15-3938.5%6.7% 6-2425.0%83.3%

Zion Williams 2021 Advanced Stats Game Log

DateOpponentResultMinsORtgUsageeFGTS%OR%DR%AST%TO%Stl%Blk%DunkRimMid2Pt3PtFTAstTOStlBlkORDRPFBPMOPMDPMNETPts
12-10 @ Western KentuckyL, 86–84Did not Play
12-12 @ PittsburghL, 67–50Did not Play
12-15 @ East Tennessee St.L, 65–60Did not Play
12-18 VMIW, 88–77Did not Play
12-21 @ Florida St.L, 72–59Did not Play
12-30β€’ @ HamptonL, 80–69Did not Play
12-31β€’ @ HamptonW, 80–69Did not Play
1-4β€’ CampbellL, 70–61Did not Play
1-5β€’ CampbellW, 85–70Did not Play
1-9β€’ @ WinthropL, 75–65Did not Play
1-10β€’ @ WinthropL, 91–83Did not Play
1-19β€’ UNC AshevilleL, 79–75Did not Play
1-20β€’ UNC AshevilleW, 84–57Did not Play
1-24β€’ Charleston SouthernW, 74–62Did not Play
1-25β€’ Charleston SouthernW, 80–71Did not Play
1-29β€’ High PointL, 59–55Did not Play
1-30β€’ High PointL, 72–69Did not Play
2-4β€’ PresbyterianW, 59–53Did not Play
2-5β€’ PresbyterianW, 91–64Did not Play
2-8β€’ @ USC UpstateL, 77–69Did not Play
2-11β€’ @ LongwoodL, 57–54Did not Play
2-12β€’ @ LongwoodL, 78–71Did not Play
2-17β€’ @ RadfordW, 69–57Did not Play
2-18β€’ @ RadfordW, 77–49Did not Play
2-22β€’ @ USC UpstateW, 69–58Did not Play
3-1β€Ί @ CampbellL, 63–57Did not Play