Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Career stats for David Wingett

RecruiT-Rank (0-100): 36.2

Yr Cls Ht Player Team Conf. Role G Min% PRPG! BPM OBPM DBPM ORtg Usg eFG TS OR DR Ast TO Blk Stl FTR FC/40 FT 2P 3P
2022So6-7David WingettSoDakStSumStretch 4145.60.30.5-0.10.5107.417.258.360.33.510.410.521.
Conf. games:Conf. games:
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:
2021So6-7David WingettSoDakStSumWing G2039.80.5-0.70.5-1.2100.416.451.
Conf. games:Conf. games:1138.
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:346.7-0.0-4.5-2.4-2.177.319.435.
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:250.01.2-2.4-0.8-1.692.721.146.750.
2020Fr6-7David WingettSoDakStSumWing G3064.10.8-0.20.5-0.7101.117.148.950.03.415.17.313.31.61.322.42.329-50.58031-82.37852-141.369
Conf. games:Conf. games:1669.
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:452.
Top 50 quality games:Top 50:349.
2019Fr6-7David WingettMemAmerWing G41.6-1.2-7.0-
Top 100 quality games:Top 100:10.7-1.5-10.0-

2019 Play-by-play stats

DUNKS At the rim Other 2-PT 3-Pt Jumpers
Tot Pct. Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed Tot Pct. Ast'ed
1-1100.0% 1-250.0%0.0% 0-00.0%0% 0-80.0%0%

David Wingett 2019 Advanced Stats Game Log

11-6 Tennessee TechW, 76–611248.515.220200000801-11-10-01-10-40-00020002-5.3-8.83.4-1.32
11-13 @ LSUL, 85–76Did not Play
11-17 YaleW, 109–10250.06.00000000240-00-00-00-00-10-00001000-0.6-2.41.8-0.30
11-22 v. Oklahoma St.L, 84–6450.022.100033001000-00-10-00-10-20-00010010-10.0-12.42.4-1.10
11-23 v. CanisiusW, 71–6310.024.9000000000-00-00-00-00-10-00000000-43.9-27.7-16.2-0.80
11-25 v. College of CharlestonL, 78–75Did not Play
12-1 v. Texas TechL, 78–67Did not Play
12-4 South Dakota St.W, 88–80Did not Play
12-8 UABW, 94–76Did not Play
12-15 TennesseeL, 102–92Did not Play
12-19 Little RockW, 99–89Did not Play
12-22 Tennessee St.W, 99–41Did not Play
12-29 Florida A&MW, 96–65Did not Play
1-3β€’ Wichita St.W, 85–74Did not Play
1-6β€’ @ HoustonL, 90–77Did not Play
1-10β€’ East CarolinaW, 78–72Did not Play
1-13β€’ @ TulaneW, 83–79Did not Play
1-19β€’ SMUW, 83–61Did not Play
1-24β€’ @ TempleL, 85–76Did not Play
1-27β€’ UCFW, 77–57Did not Play
1-30β€’ @ TulsaL, 95–79Did not Play
2-2β€’ @ South FloridaL, 84–78Did not Play
2-7β€’ CincinnatiL, 69–64Did not Play
2-10β€’ ConnecticutW, 78–71Did not Play
2-13β€’ @ East CarolinaW, 79–69Did not Play
2-16β€’ @ UCFL, 79–72Did not Play
2-20β€’ TulaneW, 102–76Did not Play
2-23β€’ @ Wichita St.W, 88–85Did not Play
2-26β€’ TempleW, 81–73Did not Play
3-2β€’ @ CincinnatiL, 71–69Did not Play
3-9β€’ TulsaW, 66–63Did not Play
3-14β€Ί TulaneW, 83–68Did not Play
3-15β€Ί UCFW, 79–55Did not Play
3-16β€Ί HoustonL, 61–58Did not Play
3-19β€£ San DiegoW, 74–60Did not Play
3-22β€£ @ CreightonL, 79–67Did not Play