T-Rank Player Stats - Customizable College Basketball Tempo Free Stats

Yr	Cls	Ht	Player	Team	Conf.	Role	G	Min%	PRPG!	BPM	OBPM	DBPM	ORtg	Usg	eFG	TS	OR	DR	Ast	TO	Blk	Stl	FTR	FC/40	FT		2P		3P
2021	Fr	6-4	Cameron Thomas	LSU	SEC	Wing G	29	84.6	6.0	5.3	6.5	-1.2	114.6	29.2	47.4	55.3	2.0	8.2	8.3	9.4	0.7	1.4	44.0	1.6	194-220	.882	135-291	.464	68-209	.325
Conf. games:							Conf. games:		17	82.2	6.0	5.5	6.5	-1.0	114.8	29.3	47.2	55.5	1.9	10.1	7.7	8.9	0.2	1.3	47.6	1.8	120-137	.876	85-169	.503	34-119	.286
Top 100 quality games:							Top 100:		20	85.3	6.2	6.0	6.7	-0.8	113.4	28.1	47.1	54.6	1.6	7.9	7.7	8.3	0.8	1.5	43.2	1.6	124-144	.861	94-203	.463	42-130	.323
Top 50 quality games:							Top 50:		16	86.1	6.1	6.2	6.8	-0.6	111.0	28.6	46.1	53.8	1.7	7.0	8.1	9.1	1.0	1.6	41.3	1.8	99-112	.884	74-164	.451	34-107	.318

2021 Play-by-play stats

DUNKS		At the rim			Other 2-PT			3-Pt Jumpers
Tot	Pct.	Tot	Pct.	Ast'ed	Tot	Pct.	Ast'ed	Tot	Pct.	Ast'ed
3-3	100.0%	52-81	64.2%	21.2%	83-210	39.5%	20.5%	68-208	32.7%	76.5%

Cameron Thomas 2021 Advanced Stats Game Log
Date		Opponent	Result	Mins	ORtg	Usage	eFG	TS%	OR%	DR%	AST%	TO%	Stl%	Blk%	Dunk	Rim	Mid	2Pt	3Pt	FT	Ast	TO	Stl	Blk	OR	DR	PF	BPM	OPM	DPM	NET	Pts
11-26		v. SIU Edwardsville	W, 94–81	33	118.3	33.2	57	59	4	4	14	11	4	0	0-0	3-4	3-8	6-12	4-9	3-4	2	2	2	0	1	1	2	+0.7	5.7	-5.0	-0.0	27
11-28		@ Saint Louis	L, 85–81	31	136.6	30.4	67	68	0	5	17	0	2	0	0-0	2-2	4-6	6-8	4-10	1-1	2	0	1	0	0	1	2	+12.0	13.6	-1.6	+4.5	25
11-30		Southeastern Louisiana	W, 96–43	25	132.1	32.2	60	71	5	9	14	21	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-2	0-2	4-8	9-10	2	3	0	0	1	3	1	+9.8	9.7	0.0	+4.0	21
12-6		Louisiana Tech	W, 86–55	29	101.0	28.2	46	54	0	10	7	13	0	0	0-0	3-3	2-5	5-8	0-3	6-8	1	2	0	0	0	4	0	-0.0	1.7	-1.7	-1.9	16
12-14		Sam Houston St.	W, 88–66	32	104.3	27.4	35	46	0	9	9	12	0	0	1-1	1-1	2-8	3-9	2-8	7-8	2	2	0	0	0	3	2	-3.3	0.3	-3.6	-3.5	19
12-26		Nicholls St.	W, 86–80	36	112.1	33.9	52	60	4	5	11	17	0	3	0-0	1-3	7-10	8-13	2-8	7-7	2	4	0	1	1	2	0	+0.9	5.8	-4.9	-0.4	29
12-29	•	Texas A&M	W, 77–54	34	149.4	29.8	69	71	0	10	7	6	4	0	1-1	3-3	4-7	7-10	5-11	3-3	1	1	2	0	0	3	2	+22.3	16.5	5.7	+10.5	32
1-2	•	@ Florida	L, 83–79	35	125.6	32.3	45	58	3	8	7	10	5	0	0-0	1-1	3-8	4-9	3-10	11-11	1	2	3	0	1	2	1	+12.9	11.5	1.5	+5.8	28
1-6	•	Georgia	W, 94–92	35	113.9	30.9	32	53	0	10	5	10	5	0	0-0	2-3	2-6	4-9	1-8	15-16	1	2	3	0	0	3	3	+3.6	3.2	0.3	+0.5	26
1-9	•	@ Mississippi	W, 75–61	4	0.0	23.8	0	0	0	0	0	60	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0	0	1	-33.1	-23.1	-10.0	-2.6	0
Date		Opponent	Result	Mins	ORtg	Usage	eFG	TS%	OR%	DR%	AST%	TO%	Stl%	Blk%	Dunk	Rim	Mid	2Pt	3Pt	FT	Ast	TO	Stl	Blk	OR	DR	PF	BPM	OPM	DPM	NET	Pts
1-13	•	Arkansas	W, 92–76	32	97.0	26.7	37	45	0	10	14	17	2	0	0-0	0-1	4-7	4-8	1-7	6-8	3	3	1	0	0	4	2	+0.7	0.7	-0.1	-2.3	17
1-16	•	South Carolina	W, 85–80	38	106.5	28.4	42	53	3	8	0	10	0	0	1-1	3-4	2-7	5-11	2-8	9-10	0	2	0	0	1	3	1	-1.3	3.2	-4.5	-2.7	25
1-19	•	Alabama	L, 105–75	31	89.3	33.4	38	51	0	4	6	24	3	0	0-0	2-4	3-7	5-11	1-6	8-8	1	5	2	0	0	1	0	-0.5	2.9	-3.4	-2.6	21
1-23	•	@ Kentucky	L, 82–69	36	85.3	31.5	33	38	5	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	3-3	2-9	5-12	1-8	5-8	0	0	0	0	2	0	1	-0.7	4.2	-4.9	-2.6	18
1-26	•	@ Texas A&M	W, 78–66	36	109.9	40.8	45	55	4	7	28	13	0	0	0-0	1-1	4-7	5-8	3-13	9-9	4	3	0	0	1	3	1	+0.6	5.2	-4.6	-1.1	28
1-30		Texas Tech	L, 76–71	39	97.2	33.9	38	50	0	0	0	13	3	3	0-0	0-1	3-10	3-11	3-9	10-11	0	3	2	1	0	0	1	+3.0	5.0	-2.0	-0.6	25
2-3	•	@ Alabama	L, 78–60	34	96.1	28.3	47	53	0	16	0	10	0	0	0-0	1-2	5-13	6-15	2-4	4-4	0	2	0	0	0	5	2	+4.0	5.6	-1.6	+0.0	22
2-10	•	@ Mississippi St.	W, 94–80	39	153.3	23.6	66	68	4	11	14	0	2	0	0-0	3-3	3-6	6-9	3-7	4-5	4	0	1	0	1	3	0	+9.4	10.7	-1.3	+3.9	25
2-13	•	Tennessee	W, 78–65	36	117.4	36.1	44	59	0	8	22	9	0	0	0-0	3-3	1-5	4-8	2-8	11-11	4	2	0	0	0	3	3	+3.9	6.0	-2.0	-0.1	25
2-20	•	Auburn	W, 104–80	29	142.5	27.8	53	64	0	12	0	6	0	0	0-0	2-4	2-6	4-10	3-6	10-11	0	1	0	0	0	4	1	+7.3	8.7	-1.4	+2.1	27
Date		Opponent	Result	Mins	ORtg	Usage	eFG	TS%	OR%	DR%	AST%	TO%	Stl%	Blk%	Dunk	Rim	Mid	2Pt	3Pt	FT	Ast	TO	Stl	Blk	OR	DR	PF	BPM	OPM	DPM	NET	Pts
2-23	•	@ Georgia	L, 91–78	34	100.2	26.4	42	46	0	13	0	0	2	0	0-0	1-1	4-11	5-12	2-7	5-8	0	0	1	0	0	5	1	+2.8	4.4	-1.6	+0.2	21
2-27	•	@ Arkansas	L, 83–75	39	117.9	23.5	61	60	2	17	6	6	0	2	0-0	2-2	8-12	10-14	1-5	2-4	1	1	0	1	1	6	1	+10.3	8.5	1.7	+5.0	25
3-2	•	Vanderbilt	W, 83–68	35	111.3	29.6	38	47	9	19	5	5	0	0	0-0	1-4	2-10	3-14	3-6	8-9	1	1	0	0	3	7	1	+3.1	5.3	-2.2	+0.0	23
3-6	•	@ Missouri	W, 86–80	36	155.0	25.5	73	78	0	8	5	6	0	0	0-0	1-2	7-7	8-9	1-4	10-12	1	1	0	0	0	3	4	+12.9	11.4	1.5	+6.0	29
3-12	›	v. Mississippi	W, 76–73	39	105.4	26.3	35	44	6	5	9	6	0	0	0-0	1-2	2-8	3-10	2-7	6-7	2	1	0	0	2	2	1	-2.0	3.7	-5.7	-3.5	18
3-13	›	v. Arkansas	W, 78–71	40	112.3	24.2	44	52	3	2	9	11	4	3	0-0	2-6	0-6	2-12	4-6	5-5	2	2	3	1	1	1	1	+10.3	7.9	2.4	+4.7	21
3-14	›	v. Alabama	L, 80–79	40	117.3	20.4	44	48	2	4	8	0	4	3	0-0	2-5	0-3	2-8	4-10	2-2	2	0	3	1	1	2	1	+9.2	7.3	1.9	+3.4	18
3-20	‣	v. St. Bonaventure	W, 76–61	39	128.1	30.3	44	56	0	9	17	5	0	0	0-0	5-8	0-3	5-11	2-7	11-13	3	1	0	0	0	4	2	+9.7	8.4	1.4	+3.8	27
3-22	‣	v. Michigan	L, 86–78	40	111.5	32.5	50	57	2	8	0	8	1	4	0-0	3-5	4-13	7-18	3-5	7-7	0	2	1	1	1	2	2	+9.5	10.0	-0.5	+3.6	30
																					1.4	1.7	0.9	0.2	3.4							23.0

Cameron Thomas 2021 Statistical Trends

Show trend for:

Career stats for Cameron Thomas

RecruiT-Rank (0-100): 95.4

2021 Play-by-play stats

Cameron Thomas 2021 Advanced Stats Game Log

Cameron Thomas 2021 Statistical Trends

Cameron Thomas 2021 Offensive Skill Curve